Wednesday, June 6, 2007


Today, the security guards unanimously ratified a contract with AlliedBarton!!!

The main points are:
  • Three step grievance procedure: 1) Account Manager, 2) District or Area Manager, 3) Director of Human Resources - with time limits for response
  • Unsettled grievance can be taken to arbitrator (neutral judge)
  • 4 hours minimum pay if called in to work; 4 hours minimum pay if shift or detail cancelled without notice
  • Fair distribution of overtime and extra hours
  • Schedule cannot be cut as a form of discipline
  • Carryover for vacation up to a maximum of 20 days - or cash out
  • 3 out of 12 sick days can be used as personal days with no less than 48 hours notice except in emergencies
  • 2 days paid funeral leave for death in immediate family
  • Uniform deposit of $200 required; company will cover cost of uniforms that must be dry cleaned
  • Company paid $10,000 life insurance policy
  • Pay for time in mandatory training classes
  • Company to make reasonable provisions for safety and health of officers
  • Lay off by seniority
  • Job opening posted, current employees get preference by seniority and qualifications. You can find out why you did not get the job.
  • 20 elected union stewards to help enforce the contract; right to have steward with you in meeting that could lead to discipline

Employees shall be placed in classifications and compensated in accordance with said classifications upon achieving the criteria of the various classifications set forth below:

Security Officer I: Classification upon new hire
Security Officer II: Classification upon successful completion of AlliedBarton MSO 1,2,3
Security Officer III: Classification upon successful completion of AlliedBarton MSO 1,2,3,4
Security Officer IV: Classification upon successful completion of AlliedBarton MSO 1,2,3,4,5
Lead Officer: MSO Level 5 and placement in said classification by the Employer

MSO Certification requires established length of service criteria as follows:
MSO 3 - 6 months
MSO 4 - 12 months
MSO 5 - 18 months (3 of 4 officers at Harvard have been here more than 18 months)

The wages officers were scheduled to receive:
Now: $12.68
7/1/07: $12.87
7/1/08: $13.13
7/1/09: $13.40

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Prepare Yourself for Civil Disobedience

Security guards are still fighting for fair wages and affordable healthcare. AlliedBarton seems to think it is reasonable that some officers are paying as much as $200 per month for family healthcare. AlliedBarton seems to think it is reasonable that officers who agree to take the most difficult, night-shifts do not receive extra pay - unlike every other service worker on campus. We disagree!

The fight is not won, yet. Let's make sure Harvard and AlliedBarton know that we will not accept an unfair contract. Living wage now! Affordable healthcare now!

Everyone who will be sticking around campus: familiarize yourself with this civil disobedience training - it will come in handy soon!

-Stand for Security Coalition

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Donate to the Strike Fund!

With incredibly high turnout, security officers have unanimously voted to endorse a strike.

They are still in bargaining with AlliedBarton, their direct employer, but have yet to see a wage proposal that adequately reflects that wages they deserve. If security officers are forced to strike to secure a fair and decent contract, we are prepared to stand behind them 100%.

Going on strike is a big risk for security officers and we are disappointed that Harvard and AlliedBarton have allowed the campaign to come to this point. We hope that the involved parties will make progress in negotiations in the upcoming days, and a strike can be avoided. However, we MUST prepare for a strike and we are asking for supporters to donate to the strike fund.

Ways to Support the Strike Fund
  • Donate online!
    • Securely donate via PBHA
    • Please type "SLAM Strike Fund" under Specific Needs to make sure your money goes to the right place.
  • Mail/Drop-Off Donations
    • Student Labor Action Movement, Phillips Brooks House, Harvard Yard, 02138
    • Or just drop off your donation in our mailbox!
  • Donation Stations
    • Look for notices for Donation Stations in your dining hall! or contact and we can pick up your donation if you are in the Harvard-area.

We are also encouraging people to think of creative ways to raise money. You could...
  • Donate proceeds from your senior sale
  • Have a bake sale in your dining hall
  • Donate your senior gift to the strike fund instead
  • Send this to your family and friends
  • Whatever else you can think of!!

If you are able to contribute, whatever amount, please consider doing so. Officers are risking a lot in this strike and will greatly appreciate your support.

Support from the Class of 1957

The undersigned members of the Harvard Class of 1957 had prepared the following letter to be sent to President Bok, President-Elect Faust, the Harvard Corporation and the Crimson, when they learned of the interim settlement of the dispute involving the University, campus security guards and student activists. We are sending this letter to The Crimson now because the announced settlement does not demonstrate to us any change in Harvard management's basic anti-labor policy.

As we prepare to gather for our 50th Reunion, we are saddened to learn that Harvard, once again, has failed the test of accommodation to a demand for social justice.

With the power and wealth Harvard has at its disposal, for the University to dismiss with a fine impartiality the demand of security guards for a living wage, for compensation comparable to Harvard's other service employees, is unconscionable. For the University to claim that it is not a party to the dispute because it involves a Harvard contractor and its employees is, to say the least, disingenuous.

Why do students have to go on a hunger strike to engage the University? Why is it that, on issue after issue, going back for years, Harvard's first response to an appeal for equity is to resist?

We have seen a long-term pattern of failure to protect the civil liberties of students and faculty, cooperation with government witchhunts, discrimination in faculty appointments on political, racial and sexual grounds, and failure to take a strong and moral position against those forces that perpetuate discrimination and injustice. Harvard too often pays lip service to humanistic values but aligns itself in practice with repressive forces.

It is long past time for the University to put its money where its mouth is.

Emile C. Chi
Chester W. Hartman
James N. Perlstein
Michael D. Tanzer

Wednesday, May 16, 2007


the hunger strike is over...
the fight continues!

2pm @ Holyoke Ctr
Thurs, May 17th

thousands have signed onto the campaign.
hundreds have come out to our daily rallies.
we've set the stage for a fair & decent contract,
NOW we must continue the pressure until the papers are signed!

people from all across the city will be coming out to show their support for security officers and their impending strike. i know everyone is busy with finals, but we can't let this campaign go just yet. please come out and bring everyone you know!

Monday, May 14, 2007

Boston Herald covers the end of the strike

Chomsky's message of support

Prof. Noam Chomsky contributed to our campaign and wrote to administrators at Harvard. Here is his message of support for us:

I would like to express my firm support and admiration for your courageous actions in putting yourselves on the line to support the elementary rights of campus workers at Harvard, and wish you the greatest success in this honorable efforts.
- Noam Chomsky

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Hunger Strike Ends: VIDEO of Day 9

Thanks once again to Aaron Tanaka:

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Statement of Support from Dr. Bernard Steinberg, Director of Harvard Hillel

Dr. Steinberg just sent us a letter of support:
I am writing to support the Stand for Security Campaign and students who ask: Does not this great university have the fiscal, political, and moral resources to guarantee that the people who protect our students earn a decent wage? Legalistic or bureaucratic answers, evasions of responsibility, have not been (nor will be) convincing because the fundamental question is moral. Such moral questions are not abstract.

In the Jewish tradition, justice and compassion, not to be confused with the concept of justice or the concept of compassion, express our ability to recognize and respond to living people with whom we are connected. What is at stake is our response-ability, with heart and body, to enable the dignity of our fellow members of the Harvard community with whom students interact daily on a face-to-face basis.

Isaiah, a Jewish teacher who lived in the 7th century BCE, cried out to the people of Jerusalem: “You oppress all your workers!” and implored: “Share your bread with the hungry; take the poor into your home, and do not ignore your own kin.”

We at Harvard must take care of our own, of our people who care for the lives of our students.

Bernie Steinberg, Director, Harvard Hillel

Friday, May 11, 2007

The Hunger Strike ends; Next phase of campaign begins

We ended our strike primarily because the workers were very concerned about our health and wanted us to end, but before we ended we got some concessions from today morning's talks with Harvard admin. More importantly, the workers told us that our pressure broke a 26 day impasse in negotiations, and that Allied-Barton agreed to more dates of negotiation and also finally came through with a wage proposal.

Here are the concessions from today's talks, summarized.

1. A letter signed by Marilyn Hausammann, reaffirming the university's commitment to those of our demands that were in line with the Katz Committee's recommendations, pertaining to subcontractors, including
a: Wages and benefits: - not using outsourcing to lower wages and weaken unions.
- employment an contacting practices should reflect humane concern for all employees whether directly employed or not
- being a good employer is defined as providing wages benefits and other conditions of employment neccessary to attract, retain and motivate employees, and compensation levels that contribute to ensuring that workers and their families enjoy at least a minimally decent standard of living
b: Due grievance process and fair treatment
- Workers should be treated with dignity and respect by supervisors, fellow workers and other members of the Harvard community.
- No employees at Harvard should be subject to intimidation, retaliation, or abuse by supervisors or others in authority positions relative to them.

2. In the letter is also a provision regarding an audit of Allied Barton's compliance or non compliance with the Wages and Benefits Parity Policy. At our last meeting we won an expedited audit that will be complete by early next week (we were told Monday or Tuesday though this date is not on the letter; instead they state "the week of May 14").

In this letter coming out of this meeting, they promise to
- make the audit results public
- arrange a meeting with reps from SLAM and other members of the community (they agreed to worker and faculty representation at the meeting) as soon as possible after the audit
- more than one meeting to discuss these issues.

We stated at the meeting that we expect to deal with the specific ways in
which Allied-Barton is non-compliant with the Wages and Benefits Parity
Policy, but also with the ways in which Harvard has implemented the WBPP.

Onward into the next phase of struggle! This struggle is working, but what
we have done so far means nothing if we fizzle out and don't keep up the
pressure until the point in time when it will be most effective ie: when the
negotiations between Allied-Barton and the union come through. If the guards
end up with a bad contract, what we have so far counts for nothing. Its
value is only as groundwork moving towards a better contract.

Statement from the Administration

We've just posted it online [pdf].

Hunger strike ends

Don't consider this post exhaustive, because I don't think I can do it justice, but the hunger strikers broke their fast today.

At the 1 PM rally today, we heard from a couple of members of the guards' bargaining committee who thanked the hunger strikers for everything they'd done and asked them to keep their health in mind. Then Michael read parts of a public statement issued today after the strikers' meeting with Marilyn Hausammann, the University's vice president for human resources. It affirmed Harvard's commitment to a living wage (in sort of ambiguous terms - I believe the phrasing was that the wage should ensure a "minimally decent" standard of living) and stated that Harvard does not intend to use outsourcing as a means for busting unions or lowering wages. The University will publicize the results of its audit of AlliedBarton's compliance with the parity policy sometime next week, probably Monday, and meet with SLAM representatives and other community members shortly after.

As Kaveri, Michael, and a number of others said today, this is certainly a victory but the fight isn't over - Harvard can issue reassuring blanket statements without making any actual commitment to a living wage for security guards. So we have to keep up the pressure, and the union has to keep up the pressure. The fight is not over, and we still need your help.

But it was definitely good to see them eat again.

The Crimson's coverage is here.

More media

Before I get to this, there is a rally at 1 PM today. State Senator Jarrett Barrios and Professor Tim McCarthy will be there. Also, the hunger strikers will report back from their meeting this morning with Marilyn Hausammann and Alan Stone, Harvard's VPs for human resources and for government, community, and public affairs, respectively. It will be important.

Now, the media:

That's your news for this morning. Come out at 1 PM!

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Day 8 Rally with Chuck Turner

Read the letter [pdf] that Boston City Councilman Chuck Turner (District 7 - Roxbury) tried to deliver to the administration, signed by 8 Boston City Councilors.

Video footage courtesy of Aaron Tanaka

Pictures are here:

Boston City Councilman Chuck Turner is barred from entering by HUPD

Boston City Councilman Chuck Turner after being turned away from delivering his letter, signed by eight Boston city councilmembers

Harvard Hunger Strike and Demonstrations Continue, Chuck Turner Lends His Support

Contact: Austin Guest (831-917-6400), Lucy MacKinnon (347-517-1885)

Harvard Stand for Security Coalition ||



This Thursday at 1pm, over a hundred Harvard students and workers turned out for the fourth day of mass rallies in support of newly unionized Harvard security guards and the 10 Harvard students who are on the eight day of an ongoing hunger strike to protest Harvard’s failure to take responsibility for ensuring that the guards receive fair wages and working conditions in ongoing collective bargaining negotiations with security firm AlliedBarton.

At the rally, students and workers marched around Harvard President Derek Bok’s office as they have every day for the past four days. Citing the Presidents’ failure to agree to meet with hunger strikers and other concerned students, the crowd chanted “What’s your problem Derek Bok, all we want to do is talk?” and “Whose Harvard? Our Harvard!” before forming a single file line and asking one by one to be admitted to the offices of the President. Each person in the line was denied access to the office by a team of five armed police officers who said they were acting on order from the Presidents’ office not to allow anyone to enter.

Last in the line was Boston City Councilman Chuck Turner, who attempted to deliver a letter signed by himself and eight other city councilmen that accused Harvard of “denying its responsibility to campus workers” and “shifting the burden of its labor costs onto the city and onto the taxpayers.” Despite a lengthy discussion with police officers on the steps of Harvard’s Massachusetts Hall, Turner was denied entrance to Bok’s office. He then turned to give an address to the crowd of gathered students in which he commended them for their outspoken support of the security guards and told them “You are Harvard’s moral teachers.”
The rally came amidst news that leaders from the Harvard Stand for Security Coalition had met with Harvard’s Director of Labor Relations Committee and were demanding a meeting with Harvard’s Vice President Alan Stone to discuss the formation of an independent committee of students, faculty, workers, and administrators to objectively assess the Coalition’s claims that Harvard’s security guard wages, at $12.68 an hour, are excessively low because they fall short not only of Cambridge and Boston self-sufficiency standards, but also of wages for other service sector workers at Harvard and security guard wages at other elite Universities around the nation.

Also on Thursday, the Coalition received a public letter of support from Noam Chomsky, Professor of linguistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a prominent national intellectual and activist.

Day 8 Rally: Boston City Councilman Chuck Turner Turned Away at Mass. Hall

At today's regular 1 PM rally we went out, yelled, sang songs, and marched around Mass Hall.

Then everyone - by my (amateur) count at least a hundred people - lined up and went to the door of Mass Hall, one by one, to try to get an audience with President Bok. The police turned everyone away, one by one.

Bringing up the rear of that line was the honorable Chuck Turner, a Boston city councillor from Roxbury. He tried to hand-deliver a letter to Bok signed by eight members of the Boston City Council, but the police turned him away, too. In fact, they didn't even let him leave the letter.

I used to think they only let people in suits get into Mass Hall. Then I figured that since I own a suit, they must only let important people in suits get into Mass Hall. Now that Chuck Turner, an important person in a suit bearing a letter signed by seven other important people, has also been turned away, I have no idea who gets in anymore, since Derek Bok doesn't seem to be showing up to work either.

Anyway, RecKlez, the Harvard Klezmer Band, is playing outside the Science Center (or possibly under my window in Thayer?) right now, and I'm going to go out and hear them - drop by if you're reading RIGHT NOW.

Also, today is Union Solidarity Day, so come back out to the yard at 3:30 - double the fun!

More in the media

The Boston Channel (ABC 5), which did a pretty lengthy story on the hunger strike yesterday, posted an update today on Javier's decision to stop fasting and Matt's health.

US News and World Report's college newspaper blog links the Crimson story on the hunger strike.

And the Crimson covers the vigil at Bok's (unoccupied) house, as well as Javier and Matt.

Lots more press coverage

Check it out here. Of note:

Day 7 Photos

On Flickr, as usual:

PBHA shows their solidarity.

The bargaining team pays us a visit.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Statement from Javier

Javier Castro, the Harvard student who was hospitalized late Monday night for dangerously low sodium levels after going five days without eating in protest of the low wages and working conditions of Harvard security guards, issued the following statement after deciding to end his fast Wednesday afternoon on the advice of physicians:
Dear friends,

After meeting with the other hunger strikers and security guards, they have told me that our struggle has received substantial attention. People are recognizing that the Harvard administration has not cooperated with us; they have not upheld the principles of truth which they claim to value. Given my medical condition, the recent victories that we have managed to achieve, and the broad support that we have been able to mobilize, I have decided to end my fast.

Still, the struggle continues. We, the coalition of workers and students, will not stop until security guards at Harvard earn a living wage and the Harvard administration acknowledges its responsibility to ensure that its workers are treated with dignity. The other fasters feel the hunger strike has been effective and they will continue to fast until they sense this issue can transition to the next phase. The struggle continues and the actions will escalate.

In solidarity,

Day 7 updates


Contact: Austin Guest (831-917-6400), Lucy MacKinnon (347-517-1885)

Harvard Stand for Security Coalition ||


Inter-Faith Community Leaders Bless Fasters as Hundreds March

One-hundred-fifty students, workers, and community members came to Harvard Yard today to protest the Harvard administration’s lack of response to student demands for higher wages and better working conditions for security guards. The group marched in solidarity with the Harvard hunger strikers to Loeb House. Ten security guards from the SEIU bargaining committee spoke to demonstrators, encouraging them and thanking them for their support.
The protest then marched to the steps of the Unitarian Universalist Church, where collective bargaining continued between SEIU and AlliedBarton. Protestors chanted: “When we fight, we win!” and “Hey Allied you’ve got cash. Why do you pay your workers trash?” The university is continuing to refuse to intervene in ongoing collective bargaining negotiations between security guards and subcontracting group AlliedBarton.

Protestors also sent support to Javier Castro, the hunger striker hospitalized Monday night for dangerously low sodium levels. Under advice from physicians, Javier ended his hunger strike in the hours after the protest. Shortly after he was released from Harvard's Stillman infirmary, where he had been transfered from Mt. Auburn Hospital.

A second hunger striker, Matthew Opitz, was also hospitalized this afternoon, under conditions similar to Castro’s. Opitz’s sodium levels were found to be dangerously low after a routine blood test at Mt. Auburn Hospital at at 2pm. Opitz was admitted to the hospital and placed on intravenous saline solution. He was released at 5:30pm this evening after his sodium levels recovered and is continuing with the hunger strike.

The Massachusetts Inter-Faith Coalition brought a delegation of about a dozen religious leaders from the Boston area to bless the fasters after the march. The inter-faith leaders said a prayer for the fasters before delivering a letter to President Bok, expressing their support for the security guards and fasting students.

Seven Days: Reflections

I’ve gone seven days without food in solidarity with Harvard security guards who are currently fighting for a fair contract and decent wages. I have another seven days of fighting in me, and another seven after that, and seven after that, and so on until Harvard University admits to and actively embraces its responsibility to ensure that all Harvard employees, contracted and directly hired, have respect and dignity at work, and earn a decent wage.

Harvard claims neutrality in contract negotiations. Seven days without food and I’m not as coherent as I could be, but it is still painfully clear to me that Harvard University, in choosing to outsource campus workers, retained its responsibility and moral obligation to use contracted companies that treat their workers with respect and dignity, and ensure that such contracted companies pay Harvard workers decent wages. Harvard’s claims to neutrality do not negate this responsibility.

I will continue to hunger strike until Harvard accepts its responsibility for campus security guards and commits to their demands. There have been criticisms of this hunger strike as an insincere publicity stunt. People have questioned out commitment to this cause because because we have stated that we are not willing to starve ourselves to death. People have also questioned the hunger strike as a tactic, claiming that strikers are going to starve themselves to death. Am I willing to die for this campaign? No, I am not. Decidedly not. I am not willing to die for this campaign because I am not willing to loose this campaign. Does anyone know how long it takes a healthy person to starve to death? I don’t, but I do know that people fighting for causes all over the world have starved themselves for 60 to 90 days without dying. Now, if I starve myself for 90 days and Harvard University has still not accepted its responsibility to campus workers, then I have failed. And I am not willing to fail. I am not willing to fail myself and I am not willing to fail the workers who do not have the privilege of making their suffering visible and tangible to the students and administrators who have the privilege of ignoring such suffering every day. I am not willing to fail the security guards who do not have the privilege of making their suffering visceral, but who suffer nonetheless.

As a student fighting for justice for campus workers, I want to be effective, not dead. I have committed to using my body as a vessel to illustrate the suffering of campus security guards, and to strengthen their voices and demands. It has been seven days for me and 15 years for campus guards. We are still hungry for justice.

I will remain hungry until Harvard University ensures these workers a decent standard of living. I recognize my power and responsibility as a Harvard student and I am using my body to pressure this, the wealthiest and most prestigious university in the world, to stop gambling with the lives and bodies of its workers. My body is a wildcard and with it I’m telling Harvard University that all familiar bets are off. Workers and students will not stop until we win this for Harvard employees. I don't have to die to make my voice of solidarity heard on this campus... as a student here I have more power than that.

I encourage people at actually stop and talk to their security guards. Ask them if they have asked Harvard to recognize their rights. Ask them if that have fought and struggled for their rights. Ask them if Harvard University has listened, or cared. This hunger strike is about forcing Harvard to listen and to care and not only that, but to take its responsibility seriously. That the administration waited until a student was hospitalized before making an effort to listen to our demands is ridiculous and inexcusable. I want a Harvard that is more committed and more accountable to this community - to workers and students - that the current Harvard administration has proved itself to be. That is why I’m striking in solidarity with Harvard security guards, because we can only achieve this if we work together.

Alumni Pledge

We're asking alumni to sign a pledge in support of the campaign, in addition to signing the the petition. So far 25 have signed on. Thank you!

Media Advisory for May 9: Harvard Students Enter Day 7 of Hunger Strike

Read the media advisory: "Harvard President Takes Vacation While Striking Student Hospitalized: Hundred March to Holyoke Center to Demand Meeting with Labor Boss"

MAY 9: Parents of Hunger Strikers Fast in Solidarity

Today many of our parents are participating in a one-day solidarity fast. Here is a statement from my parents, Ruth and Daniel Provost, who live in Sudbury Ontario:

"Today, May 9, My husband Daniel and myself will be fasting in support of the students who are on a hunger strike at Harvard. Our daughter Jennifer (Claire) Provost is one of the 11 students participating in this strike, and she has brought to our attention the situation of security guard wages at Harvard. As Jenn's parents we stand in solidarity with the security officers who are also parents and have to struggle to provide for their children. We fast today in support of the students and the workers and hope that the situation will be quickly resolved.

Sincerely, Ruth Provost"

This is not the type of thing my parents normally do, and I am really proud of them, and all of our friends and family members that are coming out and showing their support for the campaign.

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

Hunger Striker Hospitalized.

Late last night, Javier Castro was hospitalized for dangerously sodium and electrolyte levels.

Javier is on Day 6 of the hunger strike. Although he has received saline through an IV, he has refused food and as of right now is continuing with the hunger strike.

We will visit him this afternoon after the rally. Our health coordinator is on her way right now to check up on him.

PLEASE, Come out and show your support today!

1pm. Harvard Yard. Everyday.

Security officers gain support as hunger strike grows

Generally, we expect a group of people on a hunger strike to shrink as time goes on, with people having to drop out for health or personal reasons. One striker has had to stop due to a medical emergency.

HOWEVER, the SLAM hunger strike in support of security has actually GAINED TWO STRIKERS since it began on May 3.

One, Harvard undergraduate Claire Provost, made the following statement:

"My name is Claire. I stopped eating Saturday night. This [May 8] is Day 3 of my hunger strike. I have been involved in the Stand for Security campaign since September. I was sick last week and couldn't join the strike until the weekend. I am striking for the security officers I know, but also for the security officers I don't know. I am striking for the children of the officers I've met, for their families I've heard of, and for the friends and family members I do not know. I will not eat, until we all eat."

The other additional striker, Fabian Martinez of New Jersey, is not a Harvard affiliate, but recognizes the importance of the cause. Fabian began his strike on May 5 and is entering his 4th day of hunger today, May 8.

In short, we have 10 student strikers who have been striking for 6 days, 1 student for three days, and 1 unaffiliated for four - making 11 Harvard student strikers and 12 HUNGER STRIKERS IN TOTAL.

Phone in day

Whether you're on campus or somewhere across the country, we're going to be making a ton of phone calls today. The numbers to call are:

President Bok: 617-495-1502
Director Bill Murphy: 617-496-9193
AlliedBarton Security: 610-239-1100
Marilyn Hausammann: 617-495-8635

Making phone calls together is more fun! Look for us outside Science Center at noon, outside Lamont at 3pm, and in Annenberg during dinner (we'll fill up their voice mail).

Here are two sample scripts. Sample script #1:
Hello. My name is ______ and I am a student at _______. I am calling to express my support for Harvard security officers as they bargain for a better contract. They are members of the Harvard community and they should be rewarded fairly for the hard work they do. Security officers deserve wages as high as any other service workers on campus, safe and sanitary working conditions, full-time employment, fair procedures, and the right to organize! I am appalled that a university that purports to hold so much wisdom could be so ignorant of the basic needs and rights of people. It's time to stop denying your responsibility and start standing for security!
Sample script #2:
Hello. My name is ______ and I am a student at _______. I am calling to express my outrage regarding your lack of commitment to workers rights on campus. I would also like to express my concern for the students who are on their 6th day of their hunger strike. I am appalled at the university's lack of concerns for the health of your workers and students. I urge you to support our security officers and ensure that they receive a fair contract with AlliedBarton that includes: Wage parity, fair procedures, the right to organize, and steady full time work. Thank you for your time and have a great day.

Media Advisory for May 8: Harvard Students Enter Day 6 of Hunger Strike

Read it here.

Meet the Strikers

Benjamin Landau-Beispiel was born in 1988 and grew up in Philadelphia. He became politically active in the anti-war movement during the lead-up to the current war in Iraq. In high school, he organized with the Philadelphia Student Union, a youth-led organization that focuses on issues of education reform. Working with this organization made him believe that young people have a crucial role to play in building a movement to create a more just and rational world. He has been a member of the Student Labor Action Movement since he began his first year at Harvard in September.

My name isJosé Olivarez. I'm a freshman at Harvard from the south suburbs of Chicago. I plan on studying social studies or sociology while at college. My career plan is to become a writer of all trades, a teacher, an emcee, and to continue my efforts as an activist.

Matthew Opitz: I am a first-year student at Harvard College. I am 19 years old. Before coming to Harvard, I spent my entire life in Springfield, MO. I came to Harvard hoping to experience a type of city life rich in unique perspectives and cultural energy, to push the boundaries of my thought and experience, and to prepare myself for a career as possibly a teacher or professor of history and/or other areas of the social sciences. I do look forward, though, to spending time again during this upcoming summer with my mom, dad, two older brothers, older sister, friends, and my wonderful dog named Majesty.

My name is Jamila Martin and I am a senior Social Studies dropout. I am from JP, right in between Green St. and Stonybrook Stations. I love dogs and food. I spend a lot of my time right now thinking about what delicious things I will eat when this is all over. I am grateful to Harvard for the education I got here that it didn't know it was giving me. And I am really thankful for the support my roommates and parents have given me through this hunger strike. That's me on the right in the picture.

My name is Alyssa Aguilera, I'm 21 years old, and from San Antonio, TX. I have been involved in labor organizing at Harvard for the past three years and am incredibly happy about the outpouring of support this campaign has seen in recent weeks. People say you stop feeling hungry after day 3, that is a lie. Much love to my family that undoubtedly googles me daily and will find this bio, and to my friends that have been supportive throughout this campaign. VIVA LA RAZA!

Claire Provost is a senior at Harvard, studying Urban Planning and Sustainable Development. She is originally from a mining town in Northern Ontario, Canada. She is a member of the Harvard Student Labor Action Movement and is interested in political philosophy, labor issues, and the politics of international development.

Kelly Lee: I am a 21 year-old senior at Harvard University studying African American Studies with a focus in critical race theory and labor. I am a intercollegiate transfer student and spent 2 years studying at Simmons College in Boston before coming to Harvard. I grew up on the skirttails of rural Oregon in a little city called Springfield (yes, the Springfield where the Simpsons are based). My experiences growing up in a working-poor household in a blue-collar town have greatly influenced my motivations in becoming active in this campaign. It is painfully clear to me that working people deserve respect and dignity at work. They deserve a decent wage with which they can provide for their families, pay their rent, pay for medical expenses, send their children to school, to art lessons, to dance lessons, to summer camp... I grew up in a household where my parents worked harder than I ever imagined possible, but still couldn't afford these things. It is ridiculous that at one of the richest institutions in the world security guards work HARD and still don't have a decent standard of living. Harvard needs to stop playing games with workers' lives and take its responsibility seriously... and I'm not eating until it does.

Kaveri Rajaraman is a third year graduate student in neuroscience at Harvard. She is an activist for peace, labor justice, women's rights, immigrant rights and queer&trans rights. She also does South Asian community organizing as well as organizing against imperialism, racism and feudalism.

My name is Kyle A. Krahel and I was raised in Oceanside, CA, just north of San Diego. I am the oldest of six kids and the son of a stay-at-home mom and a working class dad. I was raised conservative and Republican. As I grew older and started reading the news more and learning more about the world, I started questioning the dogma I was raised on. The lead-up to the Iraq War crystallized my political views and put me squarely in the left. My time at Harvard has been spent in a lot of political communities, especially the Harvard College Democrats. I have been involved in-and-out in SLAM since freshmen year. I went to rallies and protests last semester for security guards and have talked a lot with my House security guard in Adams. I am fighting in this campaign for the security guards who play such an important part in my community here at Harvard.

Day 5 Comes To A Close

On the 5th day of our hunger strike, more than 250 people came out to the rally today. Our biggest crowd yet! A big thanks to all those who took the time to show your support and please come back every day at 1pm in Harvard Yard.

Also, on Tuesday we will be holding call-ins to President Boks's office at the following locations...

- Outside the Science Center @ noon
- Outside Lamont @ 3pm
- During dinner in Annenberg

or call from wherever you are, 617-495-1502.

Monday, May 7, 2007

Video Now Posted!

Paul Kane:

Misty McGowan:

Nelson Vega:

Comprehensive Information Packet now Available

Just posted: a comprehensive information packet about the Stand for Security hunger strike.

Sunday, May 6, 2007

Pledge to Fast for a Day

This week, we're asking you to help by pledging to fast for a day. Follow these links to pledge to fast:

"Hungerstreik in Harvard" - TRANSLATED

Here is the English translation of the story "Hungerstreik in Harvard" which ran in Spiegel Online.

Hunger Strike at Harvard
Elite students fast for the watchmen

by Franziska Badenschier, Cambridge
[translated by Alexandra Bush of SLAM]

They provide for security on the “Nobel-Campus”, but they are refused financial security: at the richest university in the world, the security staff receive only a starvation wage. Now Harvard students are protesting for them – with a hunger strike.

The “last meal” was anything but a heavenly repast: there were soggy bagels with egg salad, bean burritos and turkey sandwiches for the eleven Harvard students before they began the hunger strike. In the coming days they will get only water, tea, and juice. “We’ll eat nothing until the university’s leadership listens to us,” says Michael, a student of politics.


“Mister President, Mr. Bok, feed your workers, feed your students,” the students call as Derek Bok walks by the group; Bok is the interim president until Harvard’s first female president takes office in June. He remains silent and walks on – day one of the hunger strike.

Michael, Kyle, Matthew and co. want to get by without food for at least nine days. But the hunger strike could last even longer. The food-refusers want to keep going to their classes as long as possible. A doctor has given them the “okay”.

An equal earnings level – under the living wage

A week ago, members of the student campaign “Stand for Security” already went one day without eating, in order to advocate for Harvard’s security guards. “Ask me why I’m fasting” was written on a t-shirt printed for this day of protest. Other students held up empty paper plates or signs with the inscription “Security begins with justice”.

Acccording to the students’ statements, the security guards earn $12.67/hr – not even ten Euros. “That’s not enough to survive in Boston,” says Javier, who is protesting alongside his fellow students. Even so, Boston is one of the most expensive cities in the United States – if not the most expensive. In a letter to Derek Bok, the students demanded that the university guarantee five standards in all labor contracts: fair wages, secure full-time jobs, a safe and clean workplace, due process, and the right to organize.

But this is not so simple: the security officers are not directly employed by the university, but rather by AlliedBarton, one of the largest security personnel firms in the USA. According to Lary Rubin, the firm’s spokesperson, they are currently in negotiations with the recently established security officers’ union. There, it’s about the “whole package” with wages and benefits, such as health insurance, says Rubin. About 250 security guards are affected, all of whom provide for safety on Harvard’s property.

The University doesn’t consider itself responsible

“The negotiations are AlliedBarton’s business, not Harvard’s,” university spokesperson Jim Wrinn told SPIEGEL ONLINE. But at the same time, the university has a contract with the security firm and likes to refer to its Wage Parity Policy: people who work for the university, but are not directly employed by the university, are supposed to earn just as much as direct university employees.

According to Wrinn, in this case the policy concerns guards at Harvard-run museums. According to his own statement, Wrinn does not know how much the security officers from AlliedBarton earn, nor whether the company is fulfilling this obligation.

A few years ago, a union of internal Harvard security officers negotiated an hourly wage of $13-$14 per hour, says Austin Guest of “Stand for Security.” But he says even they didn’t get paid – with the veiled threat that it could be cheaper with AlliedBarton.

But with all of this, Harvard is the wealthiest university in the world. In spite of that fact, at the turn of the millenium everything that could be outsourced, was. Some custodial staff, dining hall workers, and other personnel didn’t even get $10 an hour.

“They should be working, not talking”

Already in 2001, these problems caused dozens of Harvard students to occupy the main administrative building and set up tents on campus. With their “Living Wage” campaign, the students (whom many otherwise like to malign as elite, snooty upstarts) put proper pressure on their university and received significant support from the ranks of unions and politicians. After three weeks the university made concessions and the students pulled back. It quickly became an example, as Stanford students also rebelled against social injustices at their own university.

Now Harvard students are fighting for their protectors, 12,000 [sic] people have already signed the petition. “We’re the first people in the buildings. As long as our jobs aren’t secure, we can’t effectively protect the university,” says a security officer as cited in the daily publication “Boston now”. He demands – like his colleagues and the participating students – higher wages and job security. Since the shooting rampage at Columbine High School in Littleton eight years ago and since 9/11, the situation on campus is tense. The massacre at Virginia Tech two weeks ago isn’t making the situation any better.

But the security officers at Harvard aren’t permitted to speak about the shooting, in which gunman Cho Seung Hui shot 32 people, seriously wounded many more and finally killed himself. “They should be working, not talking,” is the curt justification of the AlliedBarton spokesperson.

In Their Words: Worker Testimonials

Please take the time to read some worker testimonials. We often get bogged down in hourly pay rates and living wages and forget that all these numbers come from real people, with real lives. We hope that some of these testimonials will remind you that this entire campaign does have a human face.

Safdar Ali

For more than five years, I have protected the greater Harvard University community as an AlliedBarton security officer. The most fulfilling part is the relationship I have with the students and watching them grow into the world’s future leaders.
At first, I felt pride and excitement about working at one of the most prominent and prestigious universities in the world, but now that my family is barely surviving on near-poverty wages, my feelings have changed.

After working 80 hours a week to afford an apartment in Billerica, I made the difficult decision to move my wife and three children to a Cambridge public housing complex. It is hard for me, a proud man, to live in public housing, but at least I have more time to spend with my family because the rent is subsidized.

I am actively involved in the union with my fellow officers at Harvard because I want to have an active voice in creating a better life for my family.


Saturday, May 5, 2007

Day 3

Here is a poem I wrote in letter form:

Dear Derek Bok,

When my parents first
found out about my acceptance
to Harvard, neither of them

My mom told me
to stop screaming,
she had had a long day
at work cleaning up
after folks like
you and me.

I told her
I had gotten into Harvard,
and she looked at me
with the same blank face
she gives my brothers
when they ask for a new pair
of shoes we can't afford.

She asked me what it meant
to get into Harvard,
and I said, "Ma, it means
we don't ever gotta worry about
being hungry again."

President Bok,
my mom didn't want
to let me come to Harvard.
She didn't care about the world class
education you were offering,
or the career opportunities
you could promise me.
All she wanted was for me
to stay home so she knew
I was being taken care of.
It took me a month to convince her
that Harvard would take care of me.

Now, at the end of my freshman year,
I can't complain.
Your police department was there
to rush me to the hospital
when my pancreas burst
dripping bad decisions. Twice.
And I haven't been hungry
till now.

President Bok,
I know it may seem like
this is self inflicted hunger,
but back when i used to ask my mom
for hamburgers
she couldn't afford to buy
for all of my brothers
she would say:
None of us eat unless we all eat.

We are a community
and if one of us is hungry
we are all hungry.
I hope you take care of me
as well as I promised my mom
you would.


Walk, Sing, Stand with the Progressive Jewish Alliance

See more photos.

Photos of Security Guards

I just posted some great photos of security guards from recent rallies. These were taken by Michael Gould-Wartofsky:

Portrait of Security Guards

Portrait of Security Guards

Recap of Day 2

Yesterday was the second day of our hunger strike and also one of the most successful and inspirational days we've had so far. The Harvard Dems organized a 1-day solidarity fast where nearly 25 people from their membership fasted. We also had a really good turn out to our 1pm rally. We chanted, sang songs, heard words from security officers, heard from strikers, and the leadership of the Dems delivered a letter to President Bok outlining why the Dems support the Stand For Security campaign. Before we closed our rally, we joined hands and circled Massachusetts Hall (the home of the President's office) while chanting and singing to make sure President Bok and all administrators know that we are strong, growing, and not going anywhere.

In light of recent campus debate, we decided to hold an open, community meeting yesterday afternoon where anyone who had questions/concerns/complaints about our tactics could come and talk to us directly. It was a mix of new faces, old faces, and security officers. One of the questions raised was whether or not the security officers support our hunger strike and the officers in attendance vehemently voiced their support. They reiterated the same statement they have been saying, "When we speak they don't listen, but when the students speak that is when they listen."

At 9pm, we had our daily vigil, this time organized by the Progressive Jewish Alliance (PJA). A group gathered at Hillel and walked and sang in the streets towards Memorial Church. A substantial amount of students, workers, and Hillel staff were there to share a bit about the campaign and hunger strike, but also to sing and dance together and bring day 2 of the strike to a close. I think the PJA vigil was one of the best and most fun events we've had so far and I really thank everyone who came out and a bigger thanks to those that organized it. We will have pictures to share soon.

On to day 3...

Friday, May 4, 2007

Why We Are Hunger Striking

Why We Are Hunger Striking

We anticipate that not everyone – not even everyone who supports our demands – will immediately support our hunger strike. We do not wish to overshadow the salience of our claims with controversy over our methods. This hunger strike is meant to unify, not divide; it is meant to improve, not vilify. We need allies, not enemies. In that spirit, we offer the following explanation for our actions.

We expect that this hunger strike will seem abrupt to some students and faculty. For guards, however, this strike is about fifteen years too late.

Harvard has been outsourcing security officers since 1992, lowering wages and denying responsibility. In 1998, students began to call this policy into question by beginning the Living Wage Campaign. In 2001, that campaign came to a head with the 21-day occupation of Massachusetts Hall. In 2001, the Harvard Committee on Employment and Contracting Policies (HCECP), commissioned in the wake of the Living Wage Campaign, wrote the following:

“Harvard should not use outsourcing to undermine its obligations to be a good employer and to bargain in good faith with its unionized employees…Outsourcing should not be used to lower wages and weaken the unions representing Harvard’s employees.”

Harvard codified these prescriptions in its Wage and Benefits Parity Policy, specifically created to ensure that outsourcing was not being used to lower wages. In 2005, security guards began the struggle to join a union, to ensure that the goals of the Living Wage Campaign and of the Parity Policy could be implemented and enforced. In 2006, the guards won that union and – for the first time in fifteen years – were able to bargain for their own terms of employment.

The Living Wage Campaign forced the question, "Why does the richest university in the world pay poverty wages?" And Harvard answered by accepting its clear responsibility and agreeing to guarantee decent wages and conditions for all workers on this campus - directly hired and outsourced. The University would intervene in the negotiations of all the contractors on this campus and require minimum wage and benefits standards.

Now, Harvard is denying the responsibility it accepted five years ago because of a fight that began ten years ago in response to a problem that started fifteen years ago. We have been meeting with administrators for a year about this issue. We have sent letters, compiled facts and testimonials, gathered petitions and endorsements, held vigils and rallies.

In fifteen years, in ten years, in five years, even in one year, we believe that there is ample time for the Harvard administration to have dealt adequately and ethically with this situation. Instead, they have chosen to ignore and even exacerbate it.

We expect that this hunger strike will seem extreme or unreasonable to some students and faculty. For guards, however, the situation has been extreme for many years now.

We think that a guard being forced to choose between paying his rent and paying for his heart medication is extreme. We think that a guard spending four hours a day commuting rather than with his children because he cannot afford to live closer without moving into public project housing is extreme. We think that the richest university in the world pinching pennies from people who can least afford it is extreme.

Further, we find it unreasonable that members of the Harvard administration who do not subsist on the kinds of wages that security officers earn would presume to know better than they about what a just wage or fair working conditions might be. We find it unreasonable that members of the Harvard administration would claim that the university is not complicit in the practices of the labor contractor that it chooses to hire, and is not responsible for the conditions under which security officers protecting Harvard’s campus are forced to work.

We expect that this hunger strike will seem coercive and disruptive to some students and faculty. Ideally, we would engage with the university administration in a multi-stakeholder approach to campus decision-making that incorporates administrators, faculty, students, workers and other community members. Unfortunately, no such process exists. The only voices on this campus with the right to be heard are those of the President and the Corporation.

The choice that we face is not between, on the one hand, engaging in productive negotiations with the administration and, on the other hand, employing forceful tactics. The former is not an option. Instead, the choice is between, on the one hand, standing by silently as 250 of our friends and protectors are abused in our name, and, on the other hand, standing up loudly to take responsibility for creating a more just Harvard. We do not consider the former an option.

Now, when op-eds have failed, when meetings have failed, when petitions have failed, when rallies and marches have failed, now it is we who are coerced. And, given the choice of the administration to deny us the right to participate in the shaping of our own community, we have chosen the least disruptive or unnecessarily harmful means of “standing up loudly” possible.

We expect that this hunger strike will seem unrelated to our goals to some students and faculty. Through this hunger strike, we hope to physically manifest the severity of the treatment received by security officers. We hope to display on our bodies a pale representation of the pain experienced by a parent who cannot adequately provide for her children. We hope to bring this experience into the sight and into the minds of those here at Harvard who perpetrate and benefit from it. By publicly leveraging our own bodies and lives to make ignoring them impossible, we hope to awaken people to the daily ignorance of the private leveraging of the bodies and lives of officers.

We hope to express the humanity of security officers through our own human suffering. In doing so, we hope to expose the inhumanity of the disregard that we have shown for their suffering for so many years.

Thursday, May 3, 2007